need help

NEED HELP?

Find CCDC programs to help assist in advocating for you or someone you know with a disability.

LEARN MORE
ACTION ALERT

ACTION ALERT

Keep up to date with disability rights activities you care about. Choose a few topics or sign up for all of them!

LEARN MORE
issues

ISSUES

Find the most common issues people with disabilities face and how CCDC can help.

LEARN MORE

State of Colorado Department of Revenue – Division of Motor Vehicles

title-line

Citation

Barber, et. al.. v. State of Colorado et. al., D.C. Colo., Civil Action No. 05-RB-807 (CBS)

Issues

Colorado state law allows fifteen-year-olds to practice driving with a learners permit. However a licensed parent or guardian must be in the vehicle with the teenager. Teenagers are required to complete a number of hours of practice driving before they are allowed to obtain their drivers license. The State of Colorado and the Division of Motor Vehicles have refused to make reasonable modifications of policies, practices and procedures and allow a parent with a disability who is unable to drive to appoint a proxy to allow the teenaged child to practice driving.

Status

Plaintiffs filed their complaint in federal court on May 2, 2005. The parties agreed to dismiss the claims for injunctive relief because the Colorado Legislature changed the law to allow parents with disabilities to designate a driving supervisor for their children. Plaintiff’s claims for compensatory damages was denied by United States District Court Judge Robert Blackburn who granted the state’s motion for summary judgment. See attached order under “Available Documents.” This decision was appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  On April 15, 2009, the Tenth Circuit ruled against plaintiff Barber holding that the State of Colorado did not intentionally discriminate against plaintiff because the State acted to amend the statute to address Ms. Barber’s accommodation request and because (according to the court) the State statute provided for a “reasonable” alternative to her accommodation request: a limited guardianship relinquishing some authority to her sighted father to supervise her daughter’s driving.

On a positive note, the Tenth Circuit made clear that the State cannot rely on a state statute that conflicts with the ADA as a basis for avoiding liability under the ADA.

Available Document


Media Coverage


    Important Notice
    CCDC’s employees and/or volunteers are NOT acting as your attorney. Responses you receive via electronic mail, phone, or in any other manner DO NOT create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between you and the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition (CCDC), or any employee of, or other person associated with, CCDC. The only way an attorney-client relationship is established is if you have a signed retainer agreement with one of the CCDC Legal Program attorneys.

    Information received from CCDC’s employees or volunteers, or from this site, should NOT be considered a substitute for the advice of a lawyer. www.ccdconline.org DOES NOT provide any legal advice, and you should consult with your own lawyer for legal advice. This website is a general service that provides information over the internet. The information contained on this site is general information and should not be construed as legal advice to be applied to any specific factual situation.

    A+ A-