need help

NEED HELP?

Find CCDC programs to help assist in advocating for you or someone you know with a disability.

LEARN MORE
ACTION ALERT

ACTION ALERT

Keep up to date with disability rights activities you care about. Choose a few topics or sign up for all of them!

LEARN MORE
issues

ISSUES

Find the most common issues people with disabilities face and how CCDC can help.

LEARN MORE

Larimer Square

title-line

Citation

Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Hermanson Family Limited Partnership I, et al., 96-WY-2490-AJ (D.C. Colo. 1996)

Issues

Four stores in Denver’s landmark shopping district, Larimer Square, provide no access to persons who use wheelchairs; ADA requires removal of barriers when doing so is “readily achievable, “e.g., installing ramps at one-step entrances. Plaintiff was Kevin Williams, CCDC General Counsel, on behalf of himself and a class of individuals with disabilities and CCDC itself, represented by Fox & Robertson, P.C.

Status

Campbell-Ritter Corporation (operated Chatelaine store, no longer in business), AnnTaylor Stores Corporation, AnnTaylor, Inc (operated AnnTaylor store), Nine West Group, Inc. (operated Nine West Store), Hermanson Limited Family Partnership I (owns Larimer Square).

Significant Rulings and Outcome

The District Court ruled that there is no exhaustion of administrative remedies required under the Colorado Anti-discrimination Act, a state anti-discrimination law. That Court also issued a ruling that an ADA plaintiff has standing to sue in a place of public accommodations if she or he tries to access the place and cannot enter; there is no need to demonstrate concrete intent to return or make a purchase. After trial and an appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Tenth Circuit adopted a burden of proof standard for plaintiffs in readily achievable barrier removal cases that is an issue of first impression.

Unfortunately, the Tenth Circuit held that the plaintiffs, in this case, failed to meet that burden of proof at trial. The single step entrances remained at the four stores.

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals  decision can be found at the following:

https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F3/264/264.F3d.999.00-1303.html



Important Notice
CCDC’s employees and/or volunteers are NOT acting as your attorney. Responses you receive via electronic mail, phone, or in any other manner DO NOT create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between you and the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition (CCDC), or any employee of, or other person associated with, CCDC. The only way an attorney-client relationship is established is if you have a signed retainer agreement with one of the CCDC Legal Program attorneys.

Information received from CCDC’s employees or volunteers, or from this site, should NOT be considered a substitute for the advice of a lawyer. www.ccdconline.org DOES NOT provide any legal advice, and you should consult with your own lawyer for legal advice. This website is a general service that provides information over the internet. The information contained on this site is general information and should not be construed as legal advice to be applied to any specific factual situation.

A+ A-